PointFive
AI Cost Audit · Free for 90 Days

Your AI bill is growing 44% a year.
Your visibility into it isn’t.

Worldwide AI spending will hit $2.5 trillion in 2026 and $3.3 trillion in 2027. Yet only 6% of companies report clear financial returns from AI. The gap between what you’re spending and what you can defend is widening every quarter.

Sources: Gartner (Jan 2026), McKinsey State of AI 2025.

Worldwide AI Spending

Forecast, USD trillions. Source: Gartner.

2024$1.0T
2025$1.5T
2026$2.5T
2027$3.3T

+49% growth in AI-optimized server spend in 2026 alone — 17% of all AI spending now goes to infrastructure.

The Numbers

The market isn’t just growing. It’s outpacing the tools that were supposed to manage it.

Three statistics from independent industry research that describe the ground every AI engineering leader is standing on right now.

44%[1]

YoY growth in worldwide AI spending

$1.5T → $2.5T from 2025 to 2026.

Gartner

80%[2]

Of organizations report AI spend is rising

Compute appetite is the primary driver.

Flexera 2026 State of the Cloud

60%+[2]

Of AI projects are over budget on cloud + SaaS

Cost unpredictability cited as the #1 hurdle.

Flexera / IDC FinOps Forward 2026

Where the Money Goes

Most of your AI budget is infrastructure. Most of the waste hides there.

Production AI workload composition. Then add 20–40% in hidden costs on top — egress, idle GPUs, checkpoint storage, networking for distributed training. They never appear on a billing dashboard until the invoice arrives.

50–60%
25–35%
10–20%

Infrastructure

50–60%

Compute, GPU, storage, networking, MLOps, vector DBs

Integration

25–35%

Engineering, deployment, orchestration, lifecycle

Models

10–20%

Foundation model licenses, fine-tuning, custom training

Source: Webvillee 2026, FinOps Foundation breakdowns of production AI deployments. Hidden-cost band per Spheron 2026.

The Visibility Gap

You can’t cost-optimize what you can’t measure. Most AI cost is unmeasurable with the tools you have today.

Cost lives in the gaps the bill doesn't show

Hidden spend — egress, idle GPUs, checkpoint storage, distributed-training networking — adds 20–40% to monthly AI infrastructure bills. None of it appears on a standard cost dashboard until the invoice arrives.

Spheron, 2026[3]

AI cost behavior is non-linear

Token spend grows with traffic, then again with longer contexts and bigger models. Inference fleets are sized for peak. Vector stores compound silently. Traditional billing tooling assumes linear infrastructure — AI doesn't behave that way.

The org chart shifted faster than the tooling

78% of FinOps teams now report into the CTO or CIO organization, not the CFO. The decisions sit with engineering — but most cost tools were built for finance, with reporting cadences and alert models that don't survive a production AI workload.

State of FinOps 2026[4]

The Question

“What’s our AI spend efficiency, and how would we defend it to the board?”

That’s the question CFOs and CTOs are starting to ask. The answer most teams have today isn’t one.

61%[5]

Of senior business leaders feel growing pressure to prove AI ROI vs. a year ago

6%[6]

Of companies see clear financial returns from AI today — out of 88% using it

51%[7]

Of organizations can confidently track AI ROI today

The board is hearing confidence. The CFO is asking for returns. The CTO is reporting activity. By next earnings cycle, someone has to reconcile all three.

The Two-Part Problem

Visibility is Part 1. Acting on it without breaking customer experience is Part 2.

The market is full of dashboards. Cost reports. Anomaly alerts. Tagging. They tell you what you spent. None of them ship the fix. The hard problem — and the only one that actually moves the bill down — is implementing the optimization at production-grade safety. That’s where most platforms stop and PointFive begins.

01

Part 1 · See It

Understand what you’re spending.

What every cost tool on the market does. Necessary. Not sufficient.

  • Cost dashboards and budget reports
  • Anomaly alerts and threshold rules
  • Tagging, attribution, chargeback
  • Idle resource flags
  • Quarterly cost reviews

You can see the waste. The bill is unchanged.

Only PointFive
02

Part 2 · Ship the Fix

Implement the efficiency. Without breaking CX.

The hard part. The part that actually moves the bill down — without degrading the user experience your AI workload exists to power.

  • Engineering-grade remediations modeled as Infrastructure as Code
  • Behavior validated before any production change — workload parity, not just cost delta
  • AI agents draft the fix; your team reviews and approves
  • Continuous practice — Slack, Jira, ServiceNow, IDE-native
  • Zero CX regression — every change gates on workload behavior, not bill alone

This is where the savings actually land.

Most platforms stop at Part 1. They tell you what you spent. PointFive ships the fix — engineering-grade, behavior-validated, CX-safe — so the optimization actually shows up at the bottom of the bill.

The PointFive Answer

Full-stack AI cost intelligence — engineered for production workloads.

In the last 90 days, our research team shipped 17 new AI detections across Bedrock, SageMaker, and Azure OpenAI — going from zero AI coverage to a full production catalog. DeepWaste for AI analyzes inference behavior, model selection, GPU utilization, and the orchestration layers underneath. Together, in one cost model.

Inference

  • Profile efficiency vs. workload complexity
  • Cross-region routing and caching
  • Guardrail assessment overhead

Models & vectors

  • Model selection vs. task requirements
  • Custom-model storage with no invocation
  • Embedding pipeline reuse

GPU & compute

  • Endpoint utilization and idle detection
  • Off-hours scheduling for training fleets
  • Spot eligibility and oversized machine analysis

Data platforms

  • Snowflake warehouse and lineage analysis
  • Notebook idle behavior
  • Training-data and checkpoint storage tiering

Read the latest research drop: PointFive Labs shipped 56 new detections in the last 90 days, including the full AI catalog, Snowflake support, and the largest single detection drop in our history.

The Receipts

We’ve already done this for engineering teams running real AI workloads.

~$8M

Annualized AI savings, surfaced in 90 days

From the 17 AI detections we shipped this quarter alone — Bedrock, SageMaker, Azure OpenAI. Aggregated across our customer base.

~$24M

Total annualized savings, last 90 days

Across all new detections shipped this quarter. AI is 33% of it. AWS cloud-native is 53%. Snowflake, Azure, and GCP make up the rest.

10 days

Average time to first ROI

Nubank covered their full annual PointFive fee in 10 days.

On average, our customers are seeing hundreds of thousands of dollars in newly identified annual savings every quarter — and it compounds with every research drop.

Why Now

Don’t leave this until the bill comes in. By then, the architecture has already chosen for you.

The cheapest moment to optimize an AI workload is while you’re still embedding it. The most expensive moment is after the production traffic ramps and the cost shape sets.

The patterns lock in during embed

Inference profiles, GPU sizing, vector strategy, and routing get set once and rarely revisited. Optimize while you're still designing — not after a year of compounded waste.

The bill arrives in arrears

AI cost shows up six to eight weeks behind the spend that caused it. By the time a quarterly review surfaces a problem, the architecture decisions that caused it are two iterations old.

Efficiency funds the next round

Every dollar reclaimed from a wasted GPU or an oversized inference profile is a dollar your team can reinvest in the next workload — not the next overage.

Engineer-to-Engineer

Two ways to start. Both engineering-led.

You can apply for the 90-day audit, or you can book a technical consult first. No marketing decks, no qualification gauntlet — just an engineering conversation about how you provisioned, what you’re running, and where we think we can help.

1:1 Engineering Consult

60 minutes with a PointFive engineer. Walk through your current AI initiatives, how workloads are provisioned, and where the obvious efficiency gaps are. You leave with a written summary — not a pitch deck.

Book a consult

3-Month Free Assessment

We deploy DeepWaste for AI on your environment for 90 days, free. A dedicated PointFive engineer works in your Slack to validate findings, model fixes, and help your team ship them. You leave with a defensible savings ledger and a continuous optimization practice — so you can spend the reclaimed budget on more workloads, not the next overage.

Apply for the audit

Apply for the Audit

Free for 90 days. Limited cohort. Engineering-led from day one.

Scoped to teams running production AI on AWS, Azure, or GCP with $10M+ annual cloud spend. We confirm fit within one business day.

The audit is currently scoped to teams with $10M+/year cloud spend.

Applications reviewed within one business day. No commitment.

Sources

  1. [1] Gartner, “Worldwide AI Spending Will Total $2.5 Trillion in 2026,” January 2026.
  2. [2] Flexera 2026 State of the Cloud Report; FinOps Forward 2026 (Flexera + IDC).
  3. [3] Spheron Network, “AI Inference Cost Economics in 2026,” 2026.
  4. [4] FinOps Foundation, 2026 State of FinOps Report.
  5. [5] CFO.com, “So far, few CFOs see substantial ROI from AI spending,” citing RGP survey of 200 U.S. finance chiefs.
  6. [6] McKinsey, The State of AI 2025; The State of AI 2026 (Agents, Innovation, Transformation).
  7. [7] Forbes / Mavvrik, “Why Enterprises Struggle to Measure AI ROI,” 2025 study.